In the previous blog, of our series on Branching and Merging Strategies in SCM, we discussed various branching models, software development methodologies, and how popular SCM tools implement these strategies. We also saw how DevOps integration and Trunk-Based Development are shaping modern version control practices. Now, we’ll dive deeper into the security aspects of SCM and understand how branching and merging strategies in SCM play a crucial role in ensuring a secure, scalable, and collaborative development environment. 

Security in SCM 

In Software Configuration Management (SCM), security focuses on detecting misconfigurations and elements that could expose systems to risk. It also involves monitoring for unauthorised or suspicious modifications to essential data. By implementing standardised configurations—like corporate hardening guidelines—organisations can establish baselines that continuously monitor for anomalies or signs of compromise, making it easier to detect security breaches early. 

Key Aspects 

Security in Software Configuration Management (SCM) should include a comprehensive range of features to safeguard systems effectively: 

Authentication and Authorisation
Only permitted users should be able to access and modify components throughout the development process. The system must securely verify user identities and apply suitable authentication methods. If credentials like passwords are used, they should be protected using encryption or other secure transmission methods to ensure they remain accessible only to the rightful user. 

Confidentiality and Integrity
The system must enforce strict control over who can view or alter data, ensuring that access is granted based on assigned roles or permissions. This helps prevent both accidental and intentional damage to the repository or sensitive information. 

Access Control
As the project evolves, the system should continuously assess and mitigate risks to data confidentiality. It must be designed to preserve data privacy—either by avoiding the storage of sensitive information altogether or, when storage is necessary, by implementing secure practices that prevent unintended exposure. 

Availability and Trust 
Security within SCM must ensure that the system is consistently accessible to authorised users and resilient against malicious attacks. Beyond just being available, the system must also secure all interactions with verified users through trusted communication channels. 

Accountability 
All actions within the SCM environment should be logged to maintain traceability. Any unauthorised activity must be flagged, with frequency patterns noted and followed by a thorough root cause analysis to identify and mitigate threats, along with a corrective action plan. 

Audit and Accuracy 
Robust auditing mechanisms should be in place to track changes across different versions of configuration items. These systems must provide visibility into version histories and ensure that all modifications are accurately documented in line with established policies. 

Self-Protection and Recovery 
An SCM system should have the capability to defend itself from threats. In case of a breach, it should be able to initiate recovery measures or trigger an immediate shutdown or pause, alerting responsible personnel without delay. Logs, timestamps, change records, and data histories should be dependable and tamper-proof. 

Historical Recordkeeping 
The scope of SCM security goes beyond just safeguarding the software’s current state. It must also safeguard previous versions, allowing accurate retrieval when needed. Every change, including rollbacks, should be captured in the system logs. If older records need to be archived, secure storage and protection mechanisms should be employed to ensure long-term data integrity. 

Take your expertise to the next level with our
DevOps Training

Authorisation & Authentication 

In Software Configuration Management (SCM), authentication and authorisation should be driven by role-based access control. The system should define various user roles with specific responsibilities, including: 

Developer 
A developer is responsible for creating and enhancing features or modules within the software project. Development tasks are typically carried out in a local or isolated “Dev” environment. Developers also conduct initial testing of their work. 

Reviewer 
Reviewers are tasked with evaluating the code developed by others. Their role is crucial for ensuring that code is suitable for merging with the main project and is ready for further testing or deployment phases. 

Integrator / Integration Manager 
This role involves combining different modules submitted by developers. The integrator ensures that the merged codebase is functional and stable by performing integration testing and managing the merge process. 

Build Manager 
The Build Manager handles the building of software versions, tracks build outcomes, and oversees the delivery of components or complete modules. They are also responsible for rebuilding released versions when necessary and alerting the team about issues via a defect tracking system. 

SQA Manager 
The Software Quality Assurance (SQA) Manager validates the product’s quality by conducting final-stage testing, which may include user acceptance, operational, and functional testing. Once satisfied, the SQA Manager can approve the version for release. 

System Administrator 
This role involves managing the overall SCM system, which includes administering system resources, securing the environment, implementing backup protocols, and maintaining archives of released product versions. 

The authentication and access control mechanism can be enhanced through integration with Active Directory Federation Services (ADFS). ADFS is a Microsoft-based service for Windows that enables Single Sign-On (SSO), allowing users to access various applications securely across different networks. Built on top of Microsoft’s Active Directory, ADFS streamlines password management and simplifies user provisioning for both internal staff and external users. 

Security with Version Control Tools 

In Software Configuration Management (SCM), a repository serves as the centralised location that holds the entire version history of a project’s files and is shared among all team members. It mimics a traditional file system, organised with folders and nested files. For optimal security, repositories should reside on a secured server’s local storage—not in a shared network drive, which can pose significant risks. 

To safeguard these repositories, access should be regulated using secure protocols and not through basic file sharing. Version control systems typically allow client tools to connect to repositories hosted on a server, and this interaction follows a specific protocol—the defined method of communication. 

Protocols like HTTP and HTTPS are commonly used when repositories are accessed over public networks such as the Internet. Many systems allow dual protocol access, where HTTP is used for public or read-only interactions, and HTTPS is reserved for write access, which is usually restricted based on user roles. 

These version control systems can be hosted on secure platforms like GitHub, Bitbucket, or configured on servers like the Apache web server using secure protocols such as HTTPS. This setup ensures both integrity and controlled access to the codebase across development environments. 

Security Types 

SSH (Secure Shell) 
SSH is widely adopted as the standard for secure communication with UNIX/Linux systems and network hardware like switches and routers. It encrypts all data exchanged between the server and client, and supports both password-based and certificate-based authentication to ensure a secure connection. 

TLS (Transport Layer Security)
TLS provides a reliable way to encrypt communication between clients and servers. It begins with a key exchange and authentication, followed by the use of cryptographic algorithms (cyphers) to maintain data integrity. Many common internet protocols—such as HTTPS, SMTP, POP3, FTP, and NNTP—employ TLS to secure data transmission. 

LDAP (Lightweight Directory Access Protocol)
Version control systems can integrate with directory services via LDAP, which allows querying and managing user and group information, policies, and authentication. Frequently used with services like Microsoft Active Directory, LDAP plays a key role in centralising identity and access management. 

Web-Hosted Platforms
In addition to third-party tool integration, some version control systems are hosted on platforms that come with built-in authentication and access control mechanisms. Depending on the organisation’s SCM setup, these hosted solutions can provide additional layers of security and administrative convenience. 

Distributed Version Control System (DVCS) 

A Distributed Version Control System allows each developer to maintain a complete copy of the codebase, rather than relying on a single central repository. This approach ensures that the entire project history is available locally on every contributor’s machine. In the context of a multi-site enterprise team, each location may maintain its own repositories where developers can make changes, commit code, and collaborate. When needed, changes can be synchronised across sites through push and pull operations, enabling seamless integration of work from different teams.

Key Characteristics of a Scalable Distributed Version Control System (DVCS) 

The architecture of a scalable DVCS is represented in the diagram below. Its notable features include: 

• Exceptionally fast push and pull operations, as changes are handled locally on the developer’s machine without needing remote server access. 
• Developers can commit changes locally and later push multiple changesets together when ready. 
• No internet connection is required for local commits, allowing development work to continue offline. 
• Enables isolated development environments for each contributor. 
• Every developer maintains a complete copy of the repository, making it easy to share updates with selected teammates for peer reviews. 
• Seamlessly integrates with DevOps CI/CD pipelines for automated workflows. 

Challenges of Distributed Development 

Distributed development works particularly well for modular applications or Model-Driven Development (MDD) environments. It allows teams to work independently on distinct components, encouraging reusability, maintainability, and cross-platform compatibility. This approach supports collaboration across various programming languages and platforms, ultimately boosting code quality and developer efficiency. 

Despite its advantages, Distributed Development comes with certain challenges that can be effectively managed. 

While distributed development brings flexibility and scalability, it also introduces several potential challenges that need to be effectively managed: 

Breakdowns in communication: Effective communication is vital in distributed projects. If cross-location teams don’t maintain consistent and transparent communication, it can result in delays and disruptions to the development timeline. 

High management demands: Coordinating distributed teams requires strong project governance, robust infrastructure, and clearly defined organisational roles. Without these elements, managing collaboration across locations becomes difficult, increasing the risk of project failure. 

Incompatibility with some development practices: Practices like pair programming can become difficult to implement when team members are not co-located, reducing the effectiveness of collaborative coding. 

Security considerations: With code and data spread across multiple sites, stronger security protocols must be enforced to protect sensitive information. 

Possible dip in productivity: Research indicates that in-person teams often coordinate more effectively. Distributed environments must encourage regular interaction to maintain alignment and ensure consistent progress; otherwise, productivity may suffer. 

SCM for Cross-Platform Development 

Cross-platform development involves designing software applications that work smoothly across various operating systems and computing environments. The goal is to create applications that are platform-independent and adaptable to various systems. To achieve this, developers may use several approaches—such as compiling separate versions of the same application for different platforms, maintaining distinct platform-specific files, or leveraging modern APIs to tailor a single codebase to multiple systems. 

Cross-Platform Version Control Tools 

Numerous version control systems are designed to operate across different platforms, making them suitable for managing the source code of complex cross-platform software projects. However, some tools—such as Microsoft Visual SourceSafe (VSS)—are limited to specific platforms like Windows. 

Below is a selection of widely-used cross-platform version control tools, each supporting different repository models. The supported platforms for each tool are also indicated. The comparative data is referenced from publicly available sources, including Wikipedia’s list of version control software https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_version_control_software

SCM for Containers and Microservices 

Microservice architecture involves building software, web, or mobile applications using a collection of small, independent services. Each service is designed to perform a single, specific business function and can operate independently from the others. These services don’t have to be built using the same programming language or rely on the same database technologies. Microservices typically interact using lightweight communication protocols like HTTP, REST, or Thrift APIs. 

Because of their independent nature and the variety of platforms they might run on, microservices are ideally supported by containers. Containers offer a lightweight and scalable environment that accommodates platform diversity, making them a natural fit for microservices. 

The architectural model illustrated below represents an approach where complex applications are assembled using small, autonomous components that communicate through language-independent APIs. These components are decoupled and each focuses on a specific, narrowly defined task. 

The Architecture Highlights

• Granular and Decentralised: Designed for small, independently deployable components with an evolutionary and disposable nature. 
• Fine-Grained and Distributed: Built as distributed systems where each service handles a specific function. 
• Cloud-Native and API-Driven: Structured to operate in cloud environments with a strong focus on API-first design. 
• Core Principles: Emphasises evolutionary architecture, resilience, and automation—treating everything as code. 
• Version Control: Configuration files and microservice code are managed using SCM tools such as Git. 
• Container Support: Docker images, Dockerfiles, and orchestration templates like Docker Compose or Kubernetes deployment YAMLs are also version-controlled using platforms like Git. 

Conclusion  

In today’s fast-evolving development landscape, branching and merging strategies in SCM play a critical role in ensuring secure, scalable, and collaborative software delivery. Whether you’re handling cross-platform systems, distributed teams, or containerised microservices, effective version control backed by strong security practices helps maintain code quality and traceability. With the right SCM strategies, organisations can confidently innovate while staying in control of every change. 

Looking for Part 1 of this blog series? Click on the link below.